Sept. 30 – SCOTUSblog
Professor Steven Schwinn authored column:
In Reynolds v. United States, the Court will consider a surprisingly narrow issue: standing. In particular, the case asks whether a sex offender who was convicted before SORNA’s enactment has standing to challenge the Attorney General’s rule that applies SORNA’s registration requirement to pre-enactment offenders.
Read more: Standing to Challenge Sex Offender Rule