March 18 – Lawyers.com
“If the Court holds that the NVRA does not preempt Proposition 200, this could invite states to impose all manner of additional requirements, potentially undercutting the congressional purpose of uniformity in voter registration in the NVRA and, again, potentially affecting the very composition of the federal government,” writes John Marshall Law School Professor Steven D. Schwinn on the Constitutional Law Prof blog. “But if the Court holds that the NVRA preempts Proposition 200, the ruling will restrict states in imposing additional requirements and will underscore national uniformity in voter registration.”
Read more: Prof. Steven Schwinn Comments on Possible Restrictions on Ariz. Voter Registrations
